General

You are currently browsing articles tagged General.

Shortly after I published Technology Short Take #27, a reader asked me on Twitter how I managed the information that goes into each Technology Short Take (TST) article. Although I’ve blogged about my productivity setup before, that post is now over two years old and horribly out of date. Given that I need to post a more current description of my tools and workflow, I thought I’d take a brief moment to answer the reader’s question. Here’s how I go about building the Technology Short Take articles.

I’ve mentioned before that I have three “layers” of tools: a consumption layer, an organization layer, and a creation layer. I’ll break down the process according to these layers.

The Consumption Layer

This is where I go about actually finding the content that gets pulled into a TST post. There’s nothing terribly unique here; I have a collection of RSS feeds which I subscribe and I get content from people I follow on Twitter. I will also visit various Usenet newsgroups and certain IRC channels (only on irc.freenode.net) from time to time.

If you’re interested in seeing the RSS feeds to which I subscribe, here’s an OPML list of all my subscriptions.

The majority of the content I consume is web-based, so when I find an article that I want to use in a TST post, I’ll save that as a Safari web archive. I wish there was a more platform-independent method, but as yet I haven’t found a good solution. Once I’ve saved a page for future use, then we move into the organization layer.

The Organization Layer

As content is discovered via any of the various consumption layer tools, I then need to get that content “sucked” into my primary organization layer tool. I use a really, really fancy tool—it’s called the file system.

When I save a web page that I’m planning on including in a TST article, I generally save it, by default, to the Desktop. I have a program named Hazel that watches the Desktop and Downloads folders for web archive files, and automatically moves them to a WebArchives folder. From there, I use a couple of saved Spotlight searches to identify newly-created web archives that don’t have a source URL or don’t have any OpenMeta tags assigned. For these newly-created web archives, I use the Spotlight comments field to store the source URL, and I use an application named Tagger to assign OpenMeta tags.

Once a web archive has its source URL and OpenMeta tags assigned, then I have a group of saved Spotlight searches the group files together by topic: virtualization, storage, OpenStack, Open vSwitch, etc. This makes it super easy for me to find web archives—or other files—related to a particular topic. All these saved searches are built on queries involving the OpenMeta tags.

Content will remain here until either a) I use it in a TST article and no longer need it; or b) I use it in a TST article but feel it’s worth keeping for future reference. I might keep content for quite a long time before I use it. Case in point: the Q-tools stuff from Dave Gray that eventually found its way into some of my VMUG presentations was something I found in 2009 (it was published in 2008).

The Creation Layer

After collecting content for a while, a scheduled, recurring OmniFocus action pops up reminding me to write the next TST post. At this point, I go back to my organization layer tools (saved Spotlight searches and content folders) to pull out the various pieces of information that I want to include. I write the post in Markdown using TextMate, building off a skeleton template that has all the content headers already in place.

Using the saved searches I described above, I’ll search through my content to see what I want to include in the TST post. When an item is included in a TST blog post, I’ll write my thoughts about the article or post, then grab the source URL from the Spotlight comments to make a hyperlink to the content. If the content is useful and informative, I might keep it around; otherwise, I’ll generally delete the saved web archive or bookmark file. I repeat this process, going through all my saved content, until I feel that the TST post is sufficiently full of content.

Then, because it’s all written in Markdown, I convert the post to HTML and actually publish it to the site using the excellent MarsEdit application. TextMate makes this incredibly easy with just a few keystrokes.

And that’s it! That’s the “mystery” behind the Technology Short Take articles. Feel free to post any questions or thoughts you have about my workflow and tools in the comments below. Courteous comments are always welcome.

Tags: , ,

Every now and then, it’s kind of fun to look back at the content that I’ve generated in my 7 years of blogging here (soon to be 8 years). With that in mind, here are some “posts from the past” for early December.

4 Years Ago (Early December 2008)

Installing the VI Power Documenter
Continuing the FCoE Discussion

3 Years Ago (Early December 2009)

What is SR-IOV?
Snow Leopard, Time Machine, and Iomega ix4-200d

2 Years Ago (Early December 2010)

VLAN Trunking Between Nexus 5010 and Dell PowerConnect Switches
Using Device Aliass on a Cisco MDS

1 Year Ago (Early December 2011)

Some Initial MPLS Reading
Examining VXLAN
Revisiting VXLAN and Layer 3 Connectivity

Tags: , ,

Choosing the Right Tool

Kyle Mestery of Cisco recently shared a link on Twitter about Marco Arment’s choice to move back to a dual Mac setup. The article started me thinking along two parallel lines:

  1. First, it got me to thinking about my own Mac setup.
  2. Second, I wondered if there was a similar parallel about the choice of tools in data centers today.

Allow me to explain. In his article, Marco talks about how he abandoned his dual Mac setup—in which he was using a 13″ MacBook Air and a Mac Pro—for a single Mac setup using a really beefed up 15″ MacBook Pro. He had hoped to reduce the overhead of managing multiple Macs by consolidating to a single Mac that would bring together the best attributes of both. What he found a year later was that his attempt to use one tool (the 15″ MacBook Pro) really ended up being less beneficial instead of more beneficial. Instead of getting the best of both worlds, he instead inherited the drawbacks of both. To that end, he’s now moving back to a dual Mac setup.

<aside>Just as a point of clarification for those who might be unfamiliar with Apple’s product lines: the MacBook Air is a highly portable ultraslim notebook with limited expandability; the MacBook Pro is Apple’s more expandable and more powerful notebook; and the Mac Pro is a workstation-class desktop computer with oodles of CPU cores and gobs of RAM.</aside>

The first thought process that occurred to me regarded my own Mac setup. I recently purchased a Mac Pro because I needed a computer that could provide more raw compute capacity than my laptop possessed. Reading Marco’s article validated (in a way) my thinking. However, it also challenged me to consider the type and configuration of laptop that I use. I migrated from a 15″ MacBook Pro to a smaller 13″ MacBook Pro last year, but I still insisted on a MacBook Pro with 8GB of RAM instead of a lightweight MacBook Air with only 4GB of RAM. Don’t get me wrong; I’m extremely happy with my MBP. It does lead me to believe, though, that my next laptop choice needs to be a choice that optimizes its role. What do I mean by that? I chose a Mac Pro because I needed CPU power and lots of RAM. The Mac Pro was the right tool for that job. Similarly, when I select my next laptop, I need to prioritize what I need out of a laptop (weight, size, mobility) and choose the right tool for the job. Instead of choosing a laptop based on how expandable it is, perhaps I should be looking at how suited it is for a highly mobile worker.

There’s a second train of thought here as well, and this train of thought pertains to the tools that we, as IT professionals, choose for our data centers. We also need to make sure that we are selecting the right tool for the job. Marco’s experience shows that using a single tool to perform multiple functions doesn’t always work as well as one might think. He made his initial decision in an effort to reduce complexity—an admirable goal, I’d say. I believe that many IT professionals also strive to reduce complexity in their data centers, and many IT professionals probably do that by reducing the number of technologies, products, or vendors in their data center. But are we sacrificing the functionality of our data centers as a result? When we are choosing on the basis of reducing complexity instead of choosing the right tool for the job, what are we losing? What are we giving up? Instead of trying to shoehorn a solution we already have into a role for which it really isn’t suited simply to “reduce complexity,” shouldn’t we focus instead on choosing the right tool for the job? Shouldn’t we select tools that are optimized to perform the function we need them to perform? Yes, we do need standards and guidelines, and I’m not saying that we shouldn’t strive to keep complexity from overwhelming the data center. But what should be our primary driver for tool selection—the reduction of complexity via the re-use of a less-than-optimal tool, or the selection of a tool optimized for the function it needs to perform?

I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments.

Tags: ,

In case you hadn’t heard, Spousetivities—the spouse activities that had their genesis at VMworld 2008 in Las Vegas—has expanded once again! Last year, Spousetivities expanded to include EMC World, and just last week Crystal concluded her second year of activities at EMC World 2012 in Las Vegas. This year, Spousetivities expands to not only include VMworld and EMC World, but also Dell Storage Forum 2012, located this year in Boston, MA.

This is a great opportunity for Dell Storage Forum conference attendees to bring along their families to Boston and have confidence that their families will be well cared for and offered a great set of activities. Here’s a quick peek at what Spousetivities has planned for Dell Storage Forum:

  • A whale watching tour (get to know Zeppelin, Regulus, Ember, Eden, Tear, and the other whales!)
  • Private trolley and walking tour of MIT
  • A sight-seeing trolley tour
  • Trolley and walking wine tour
  • Boston Freedom Trail sight-seeing tour
  • Private lunch cruise on a paddle wheel boat
  • Private trolley and walking tour of Harvard

If you ask me, that’s a pretty impressive line-up of activities. Dell Storage Forum 2012 starts in only a couple of weeks, so hurry and visit the registration page to sign up for your activities. Also, help spread the word to anyone you might know who is also attending Dell Storage Forum. Given that Crystal and Spousetivities is new to the Dell community, I know that she could use all the help she can to get the word out about Spousetivities at Dell Storage Forum this year.

If you’re headed to Boston for Dell Storage Forum and considering taking your family/spouse/partner with you, you definitely need to take a look at the list of activities. Your family/spouse/partner is worth it!

Tags: ,

A Comment Policy Reminder

I encourage open discussion and conversation here on my site, and I’m thrilled that readers feel welcome to share their viewpoints (even when those viewpoints differ from my own). To help foster this sense of free discourse, there are two rules upon which I insist for all comments:

  1. First, all comments should be courteous. There’s no reason to personally attack another reader or author—simply state your position, why that is your position, the facts you feel support your position, etc. Leave the personal attacks somewhere else.
  2. Second, all commenters should provide full disclosure. This helps avoid even the appearance of wrongdoing. Where a vendor’s products helps to address readers’ needs, I don’t mind a vendor mentioning their products. That vendor just needs to be sure to provide full disclosure. If you have a business relationship with an organization, disclose that. Be transparent and provide full disclosure.

Recently, I’ve had one commenter leave a series of comments on the site that blatantly and bluntly promote his employer’s products. Unfortunately, this commenter has failed to provide full disclosure. For that reason, I’ve been simply deleting this commenter’s comments. And I’m going to continue to delete this commenter’s blatant, outright comment spam as long as he/she refuses to provide full disclosure. Other readers deserve the right to know why a commenter is pushing a particular product or feature!

Tags: ,

Train Signal, Welcome!

I’m very excited to welcome Train Signal to the list of site sponsors! I’m sure that many of you are probably already familiar with Train Signal and their extensive list of training products, and I’ve been told by Train Signal that they’ll have some VMware vSphere training products available soon. I’m looking forward to seeing those!

If you are in the market for technology training products, I encourage you to visit Train Signal—feel free to use the ad in the sidebar, which is linked to their site—and see if they have something that fits your needs.

Tags: , , ,

Question to my Readers

One of the things that I thought might be interesting, perhaps even useful, to the readers would be to present various views on virtualization, cloud computing, etc., from industry executives. My first foray into this sort of thing was the recent e-mail interview with Surgient CTO, Dave Malcolm.

While I might think it is interesting or cool or useful, there are about 5,000 of you out there that may have a very different view. So, in the interest of trying to make this site as useful and informative as it can be, I’d like to know what you think. Is this idea a good idea? Do you find it interesting, informative? Or was it too “salesy”? I don’t want my site being turned into a platform for executives to just stand up and plug their products. Is there a better way I could do this, perhaps a different format? Should we require that people not plug their own products at all?

I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Tags: ,

I’d like to welcome our second sponsor, Hyper9! As you know, Hyper9 recently launched their flagship search-based administration product. I’m excited to be able to partner with them and I appreciate their sponsorship of the site.

If there are any other companies out there that may be interested in sponsoring the site, I have a few spots still remaining. Feel free to contact me if you want more information.

Tags: , , ,

Site Maintenance

The site will be going down for site maintenance on Monday, March 23, at approximately 11PM MST (GMT-7). The site could be unavailable for as much as 2 hours. According to my hosting company (Bluehost), the hardware on which the site is running is getting upgraded. We should see an improvement in performance as a result of the upgrade.

I apologize in advance for any inconvenience.

Tags: , ,

IT Knowledge Exchange

I’ve blogged for SearchVMware.com a couple of times, and their blog, Virtualization Pro, is hosted on IT Knowledge Exchange. It wasn’t until just recently that I noticed what IT Knowledge Exchange (ITKE) was really all about.

In addition to hosting a number of blogs—both editorial, which is where you’ll find Virtualization Pro, as well as by ITKE members—ITKE also hosts IT Answers. Got a technical question? Here’s the place to ask it. All sorts of people with all sorts of expertise are asking questions and answering questions here, which makes this a pretty good resource. If you’re familiar with the VMware Community Forums, this is similar (but not constrained to a single vendor’s products). If you’re pressed for time, like I am, then ITKE’s e-mail subscriptions and RSS feeds could be a big timesaver.

So, if you haven’t checked out ITKE, it might be worth your time to go have a look.

Tags: , ,

« Older entries