<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Aggregation and VLAN Trunking with Brocade FastIron Switches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/comment-page-1/#comment-63730</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=2907#comment-63730</guid>
		<description>&quot;Route based on IP hash&quot; is there, yes. LACP is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Route based on IP hash&#8221; is there, yes. LACP is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cowley</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/comment-page-1/#comment-63687</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=2907#comment-63687</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you are using vSphere, note that you’ll need to use vSphere 5.1 and a vSphere Distributed Switch (VDS)&quot;

I am pretty sure that Route based on IP hash is in the standard vSwitch as well. Don&#039;t have a system to hand to look though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you are using vSphere, note that you’ll need to use vSphere 5.1 and a vSphere Distributed Switch (VDS)&#8221;</p>
<p>I am pretty sure that Route based on IP hash is in the standard vSwitch as well. Don&#8217;t have a system to hand to look though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul De Audney</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/comment-page-1/#comment-63613</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul De Audney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=2907#comment-63613</guid>
		<description>When you dual-mode a port that is tagged to multiple vlans you should/must specify the vlan ID that you want as untagged.

In your example that would be:

switch(config-vlan-30)# interface ethernet 24
switch(config-if-e1000-24)# dual-mode 30

&quot;Syntax: [no]dual-mode[]
The  specifies the port Port Native VLAN. This is the VLAN on which the port will support untagged frames. By default, the Port Native VLAN is the same as the default VLAN (which is VLAN 1 by default).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you dual-mode a port that is tagged to multiple vlans you should/must specify the vlan ID that you want as untagged.</p>
<p>In your example that would be:</p>
<p>switch(config-vlan-30)# interface ethernet 24<br />
switch(config-if-e1000-24)# dual-mode 30</p>
<p>&#8220;Syntax: [no]dual-mode[]<br />
The  specifies the port Port Native VLAN. This is the VLAN on which the port will support untagged frames. By default, the Port Native VLAN is the same as the default VLAN (which is VLAN 1 by default).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2012/10/26/link-aggregation-and-vlan-trunking-with-brocade-fastiron-switches/comment-page-1/#comment-63591</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=2907#comment-63591</guid>
		<description>FastIron (ex Foundry Networks) switches uses nearly the same syntax as Cisco IOS.  I was told it works the same way most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FastIron (ex Foundry Networks) switches uses nearly the same syntax as Cisco IOS.  I was told it works the same way most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
