<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Network Interface Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-48818</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1862#comment-48818</guid>
		<description>Scott:

Help me understand this. Why is a VNTag necessary? It is said that it is used so that the adjacent bridge can differentiate traffic from different VMs.

But each VM has a virtual NIC and a MAC address assigned to it, so why cant the bridge leverage its normal learning process to bind a VMs MAC address with a physical output port?

What does the VNTag provide the bridge and how does it use it?

Sorry for asking such a basic question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott:</p>
<p>Help me understand this. Why is a VNTag necessary? It is said that it is used so that the adjacent bridge can differentiate traffic from different VMs.</p>
<p>But each VM has a virtual NIC and a MAC address assigned to it, so why cant the bridge leverage its normal learning process to bind a VMs MAC address with a physical output port?</p>
<p>What does the VNTag provide the bridge and how does it use it?</p>
<p>Sorry for asking such a basic question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-47699</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1862#comment-47699</guid>
		<description>STP! ACK! no STP!

http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/12/02/extremely-simple-redundancy-protocol/

life is better without STP anywhere on the network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STP! ACK! no STP!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/12/02/extremely-simple-redundancy-protocol/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/12/02/extremely-simple-redundancy-protocol/</a></p>
<p>life is better without STP anywhere on the network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-47698</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1862#comment-47698</guid>
		<description>AFidel,

There are a couple of advantages I mentioned in the article. First, overall network bandwidth is improved because there is less need for STP within an NIV architecture. Second, there are generally fewer points of management in an NIV architecture, since the IVs appear as part of the upstream IV-capable bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFidel,</p>
<p>There are a couple of advantages I mentioned in the article. First, overall network bandwidth is improved because there is less need for STP within an NIV architecture. Second, there are generally fewer points of management in an NIV architecture, since the IVs appear as part of the upstream IV-capable bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AFidel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-47697</link>
		<dc:creator>AFidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1862#comment-47697</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m just slow at picking this up, but what advantage does NIV have over presenting the vswitch as an access layer switch plugging into your distribution layer switches? Switch architectures already have to deal with MAC&#039;s moving from port to port thanks to failover technologies long in use and with the tiered model they also have to deal with multiple identities per port due to the fact that the access layer switch aggregates up to the distribution level. Perhaps I&#039;m missing the problem that NIV is trying to solve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just slow at picking this up, but what advantage does NIV have over presenting the vswitch as an access layer switch plugging into your distribution layer switches? Switch architectures already have to deal with MAC&#8217;s moving from port to port thanks to failover technologies long in use and with the tiered model they also have to deal with multiple identities per port due to the fact that the access layer switch aggregates up to the distribution level. Perhaps I&#8217;m missing the problem that NIV is trying to solve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2010/03/16/understanding-network-interface-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-47695</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1862#comment-47695</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by scott_lowe: What is Network Interface Virtualization (NIV)? More information here: http://tr.im/S4Yq...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by scott_lowe: What is Network Interface Virtualization (NIV)? More information here: <a href="http://tr.im/S4Yq.." rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/S4Yq..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

