<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualization Short Take #28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/08/18/virtualization-short-take-28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/08/18/virtualization-short-take-28/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveC</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/08/18/virtualization-short-take-28/comment-page-1/#comment-45531</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1537#comment-45531</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all of these great links.  They are very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all of these great links.  They are very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2009/08/18/virtualization-short-take-28/comment-page-1/#comment-45529</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=1537#comment-45529</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in the no-upgrade group.  I really, really like ESX 3.5.  It more than does the job for what me and my clients need, so I&#039;ve been hard-pressed to recommend an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the no-upgrade group.  I really, really like ESX 3.5.  It more than does the job for what me and my clients need, so I&#8217;ve been hard-pressed to recommend an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

