Comments on: More Hyper9 Beta Invitations Available http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/ The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Andrew http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-44560 Andrew Fri, 22 May 2009 15:20:16 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-44560 Send it over :) Send it over :)

]]> By: Chris Lukas http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42840 Chris Lukas Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:04:49 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42840 Hi Scott, I have an appropriate lab environment for this...I'm an iSCSI fan too... Hi Scott, I have an appropriate lab environment for this…I’m an iSCSI fan too…

]]> By: Jason Grant http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42621 Jason Grant Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:20:58 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42621 Scott, I'd like to participate if there is still a slot available. I have a pilot environment and a test environment. -j. Scott, I’d like to participate if there is still a slot available.

I have a pilot environment and a test environment.

-j.

]]> By: Chris http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42619 Chris Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:41:55 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42619 I'd be interested in testing the product. It looking like a interesting way to solve a couple of issues. I’d be interested in testing the product. It looking like a interesting way to solve a couple of issues.

]]> By: Adam Stephens http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42617 Adam Stephens Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:12:42 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42617 Scott, We meet these requirements and are interested in a beta invite. Thanks, -adam Scott,

We meet these requirements and are interested in a beta invite.

Thanks,
-adam

]]> By: John Sacramoni http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42612 John Sacramoni Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:04:13 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42612 Any chance I could get in on that beta. Lab ready to go. Any chance I could get in on that beta. Lab ready to go.

]]> By: Aaron Sweemer http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42603 Aaron Sweemer Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:57:53 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42603 Hey Scott, Aaron here. I finally got my lab set up and meet the requirements. If you've still got an extra spot, I'm interested. Thanks :) Hey Scott, Aaron here. I finally got my lab set up and meet the requirements. If you’ve still got an extra spot, I’m interested. Thanks :)

]]> By: John http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42601 John Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:28:25 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42601 I would also be interested in taking this for a spin. I would also be interested in taking this for a spin.

]]> By: Christian Mohn (h0bbel) http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/comment-page-1/#comment-42582 Christian Mohn (h0bbel) Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:46:01 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/12/03/more-hyper9-beta-invitations-available/#comment-42582 Hi, Scott. Seems like an interesting approach, and I'm willing to test it if possible. We meet the requirements and should be a good fit for testing. Hi, Scott. Seems like an interesting approach, and I’m willing to test it if possible. We meet the requirements and should be a good fit for testing.

]]>