<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Note on ESX and ESXi Storage Multipathing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42597</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42597</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks like the problem of ESX not remembering the path settings after rebooting is caused (at least in my case) by the fact that it tries to restore those settings before the SW iSCSI has been initialized, so it obviously can&#039;t find any of the LUNs. Is this some kind of hint from VMware telling us to go out and buy a QLogic adapter? I&#039;m already surprised that we can&#039;t specify static targets when using the software initiator, but this is just plain silly. What happens to people running ESXi who can&#039;t run scripts during startup?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like the problem of ESX not remembering the path settings after rebooting is caused (at least in my case) by the fact that it tries to restore those settings before the SW iSCSI has been initialized, so it obviously can&#8217;t find any of the LUNs. Is this some kind of hint from VMware telling us to go out and buy a QLogic adapter? I&#8217;m already surprised that we can&#8217;t specify static targets when using the software initiator, but this is just plain silly. What happens to people running ESXi who can&#8217;t run scripts during startup?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42587</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42587</guid>
		<description>Has anybody managed to get this to work? I&#039;m using esxcfg-mpath on ESX to change the load balancing policy for 3 LUNs (would be a single one if ESX didn&#039;t have a 2TB limit per LUN), and even though I&#039;m specifying the LUNs using the VML name, the policy still gets reset back to &quot;Fixed&quot; when I reboot.

I guess I can just put this into a script that gets run when ESX boots, but it would be nice if ESX stored this and remembered it (actually, running esxcfg-mpath -r restores the policy I set, but why doesn&#039;t it do it automatically when booting?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody managed to get this to work? I&#8217;m using esxcfg-mpath on ESX to change the load balancing policy for 3 LUNs (would be a single one if ESX didn&#8217;t have a 2TB limit per LUN), and even though I&#8217;m specifying the LUNs using the VML name, the policy still gets reset back to &#8220;Fixed&#8221; when I reboot.</p>
<p>I guess I can just put this into a script that gets run when ESX boots, but it would be nice if ESX stored this and remembered it (actually, running esxcfg-mpath -r restores the policy I set, but why doesn&#8217;t it do it automatically when booting?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Fagnani</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42256</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Fagnani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42256</guid>
		<description>Guys,

Although I&#039;m a little late weighing in on this issue, I never-the-less have some pretty bad news on the most bizarre behavior regarding ESX multi-pathing, Active Preferred Paths and HBA FC Storage.  I work at a Shop with nearly 50 ESX 3.5 Update 2 Hosts spread across 7 HA/DRS Clusters Targeted at NetApp Filers, so naturally we have the v3.1 Host Attach kit installed.

Most of the Filers are in Single-Image Mode, but the issue pertains to Partner Mode as well.  The issue is that I have to check for Path optimization every week on the Hosts as not only does the Active Path flip from a Primary to a Proxy Target, but the Preferred designation flips as well so the Path never fails back to a Primary Target Path.

If I don&#039;t stay on top of it, the Filers send a boatload of FCP Partner-Path Misconfigured Notifications which is not nice.  I&#039;ve been watching this since ESX v3.01, and it can happen on a Host reboot, rescan or, all by itself.

It&#039;s only documented that the Preferred Path designation is persistant across reboots...It doesn&#039;t actually work that way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;m a little late weighing in on this issue, I never-the-less have some pretty bad news on the most bizarre behavior regarding ESX multi-pathing, Active Preferred Paths and HBA FC Storage.  I work at a Shop with nearly 50 ESX 3.5 Update 2 Hosts spread across 7 HA/DRS Clusters Targeted at NetApp Filers, so naturally we have the v3.1 Host Attach kit installed.</p>
<p>Most of the Filers are in Single-Image Mode, but the issue pertains to Partner Mode as well.  The issue is that I have to check for Path optimization every week on the Hosts as not only does the Active Path flip from a Primary to a Proxy Target, but the Preferred designation flips as well so the Path never fails back to a Primary Target Path.</p>
<p>If I don&#8217;t stay on top of it, the Filers send a boatload of FCP Partner-Path Misconfigured Notifications which is not nice.  I&#8217;ve been watching this since ESX v3.01, and it can happen on a Host reboot, rescan or, all by itself.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only documented that the Preferred Path designation is persistant across reboots&#8230;It doesn&#8217;t actually work that way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42186</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42186</guid>
		<description>Wade, as Nick points out, the Host Utilities Kit will ensure that preferred/active paths are consistent. This is one reason to be sure to include the NetApp Host Utilities Kit in your VMware ESX builds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wade, as Nick points out, the Host Utilities Kit will ensure that preferred/active paths are consistent. This is one reason to be sure to include the NetApp Host Utilities Kit in your VMware ESX builds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Triantos</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42184</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Triantos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42184</guid>
		<description>Yes. The Host Utilities Kit uses the vml thus preferred/active paths are consistent across reboots. it;s easy and it&#039;s free</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. The Host Utilities Kit uses the vml thus preferred/active paths are consistent across reboots. it;s easy and it&#8217;s free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Holmes</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42174</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42174</guid>
		<description>For ESX and Netapp , doesn&#039;t the NetApp host utilities kit for ESX automatically pick the optimized preferred path?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For ESX and Netapp , doesn&#8217;t the NetApp host utilities kit for ESX automatically pick the optimized preferred path?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Triantos</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42173</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Triantos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42173</guid>
		<description>You want active/active loadbalancing with ALUA support for asymmetric active/active arrays that reports paths as Active/Optimized, Active/Unoptimized. All of major storage arrays VMware&#039;s been deployed today already provide ALUA support. 

For symmetric active/active arrays that report all paths as Active/Optimized round robin or any other load balancing algorithm alone will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want active/active loadbalancing with ALUA support for asymmetric active/active arrays that reports paths as Active/Optimized, Active/Unoptimized. All of major storage arrays VMware&#8217;s been deployed today already provide ALUA support. </p>
<p>For symmetric active/active arrays that report all paths as Active/Optimized round robin or any other load balancing algorithm alone will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Triantos</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42172</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Triantos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42172</guid>
		<description>Round-robin with ALUA is the answer for asymmetric active-active arrays. For symmetric active-active arrays that report all paths as Active/Optimized then active-active loadbalancing alone will do the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round-robin with ALUA is the answer for asymmetric active-active arrays. For symmetric active-active arrays that report all paths as Active/Optimized then active-active loadbalancing alone will do the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Boche</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42168</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Boche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42168</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about the rest of you, but I don&#039;t want to have to re-configure paths after every reboot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the rest of you, but I don&#8217;t want to have to re-configure paths after every reboot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/comment-page-1/#comment-42165</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/10/27/quick-note-on-esx-and-esxi-storage-multipathing/#comment-42165</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s better to wait for the vStorage multipathing solution by the vendors and/or the roundrobin to be fully supported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s better to wait for the vStorage multipathing solution by the vendors and/or the roundrobin to be fully supported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

