<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TA2644: Networking I/O Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-48660</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/#comment-48660</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the story with VMDirectPath only allowing two PCI channels per VM? Is that fixable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the story with VMDirectPath only allowing two PCI channels per VM? Is that fixable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg!</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-46658</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/#comment-46658</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I was curious about which cards (or drivers) are Netqueue-enabled?  I have searched (not very hard, mind you) for kernel driver options for the e1000e driver to no avail, but we also run Broadcoms using  the bnx driver.

This is an item I would be curious to test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I was curious about which cards (or drivers) are Netqueue-enabled?  I have searched (not very hard, mind you) for kernel driver options for the e1000e driver to no avail, but we also run Broadcoms using  the bnx driver.</p>
<p>This is an item I would be curious to test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj Thakkar</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-41682</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj Thakkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/#comment-41682</guid>
		<description>Thanks for capturing the talk so nicely Scott. A few clarifications:

&gt;&gt; This is fast, but even a software-only implementation of TSO can provide benefits.

I mentioned that even s/w LRO can give advantages. TSO is found on most NICs already but LRO is not there yet.

&gt;&gt; It also looks like NetQueue can be used in load balancing/traffic shaping, although I’m unclear exactly how as I didn’t understand what the presenter said.

Netqueue enabled cards have limited number of queues hence we need to give these queues to VM&#039;s which need it the most. We do this by programming the queues based on the load of VMs. This is what I meant by load balancing the queues across VM&#039;s.

We don&#039;t get traffic shaping through netqueue but it does provide some isolation as the NIC can pull packets from each of the different TX queue one by one (e.g: in round robin manner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for capturing the talk so nicely Scott. A few clarifications:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; This is fast, but even a software-only implementation of TSO can provide benefits.</p>
<p>I mentioned that even s/w LRO can give advantages. TSO is found on most NICs already but LRO is not there yet.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; It also looks like NetQueue can be used in load balancing/traffic shaping, although I’m unclear exactly how as I didn’t understand what the presenter said.</p>
<p>Netqueue enabled cards have limited number of queues hence we need to give these queues to VM&#8217;s which need it the most. We do this by programming the queues based on the load of VMs. This is what I meant by load balancing the queues across VM&#8217;s.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t get traffic shaping through netqueue but it does provide some isolation as the NIC can pull packets from each of the different TX queue one by one (e.g: in round robin manner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VMworld sessions I wish I&#8217;d attended</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/comment-page-1/#comment-41664</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; VMworld sessions I wish I&#8217;d attended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/09/18/ta2644-networking-io-virtualization/#comment-41664</guid>
		<description>[...] Networking I/O Virtualization - TA2644 - Scott Lowe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Networking I/O Virtualization &#8211; TA2644 &#8211; Scott Lowe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

