<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storage Short Take #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/07/14/storage-short-take-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/07/14/storage-short-take-1/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mlambert</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/07/14/storage-short-take-1/comment-page-1/#comment-40067</link>
		<dc:creator>mlambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/07/14/storage-short-take-1/#comment-40067</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Very good list.  The SCSI timeout for NFS datastores is a very good one to know.  

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Very good list.  The SCSI timeout for NFS datastores is a very good one to know.  </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
