A lot of virtualization-related articles were published while I was in Orlando at Microsoft Tech-Ed 2008. Here are a few that caught my attention over that time period as well as in the last few days.
- Rich Brambley over at VM /ETC is on a roll with a couple of good articles, one on VMFS storage sizing for performance and one on downgrading the VM HAL after P2V. The title for that second article was “How to P2V Multi-processor servers to Uni-processor VMs”, and I was hoping that it was a new trick with VMware Converter or some other P2V tool that would actually take care of the HAL for me. Alas, not this time. Rich’s article is useful information nevertheless, don’t get me wrong. I am curious, though, as to the source of Rich’s storage sizing recommendations. Rich, can you share where you derived those recommendations?
- Ryan Arneson shares some of his experiences in using an X4500 with ZFS as an NFS datastore for ESX. Ryan’s post reminds readers of the some of the requirements for using NFS with ESX, so readers new to that sort of configuration may find it helpful.
- Gabe brings us, courtesy of this VMware Communities thread, some information on getting DRS VMotion information from the VC database. That’s handy. In an earlier article, Gabe also weighed in on storage sizing as well. This seems to be getting quite a bit of attention recently (gee, I can’t imagine why). Readers, I’d love to hear your thoughts on storage sizing approaches, algorithms, etc. Please share them in the comments!
- I found this article discussing NFS vs. CIFS for VMware. At first I was a bit baffled, but then I realized the author must have been talking about VMware’s hosted products like VMware Server not ESX. Anyone else tried this?
- Rick Blythe aka VMwareWolf posted an article about VM customization failing after VC 2.5 upgrade. Fortunately, the fix is easy; just download and install the correct version of the Sysprep tools and put them in the right location on the VC server. The details are all provided at his site, so check that out.
- The VMware Fusion Team announced support for running Mac OS X Leopard Server in Fusion 2.0 back during the WWDC, but it seems that Parallels may have beaten them to the punch with an actually shipping product.
- Schley Andrew Kutz has released a version of the VI Toolkit for .NET that supports mocking. More information on mocking the VI Toolkit is available here. I haven’t seen any sample taunts yet. (You’ll get that in a few minutes.)
In addition, as a follow-up to my Tech-Ed coverage of the Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) toolkit, I found these two articles in my list of “things to blog about”:
Microsoft Assessment and Planning How-To Series: Part 1 (Server Virtualization Candidacy Reporting)
[VIDEO] Microsoft Assessment and Planning How-To Series: Part 1 (Server Virtualization Candidacy Reporting)
Note also that the beta program for MAP 3.1 is already running; this version will add support for Hyper-V. More information here. (I couldn’t remember if I stated anything about this my Tech-Ed session liveblogs.)
That about does it this time around. Thanks for reading!
Tags: ESX, NFS, Storage, Virtualization, VMware


8 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/06/17/virtualization-short-take-10/trackback/
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Rich
Scott,
The VMFS sizing post is the cumulation of my work and experience over the last few years collaborating with other VCPs and storage admins. It is based on all of the recommendations for sizing and performance from VMware and the VMware community (or at least my understanding of - correct me where I am off!) It’s a planning formula, and as I mention in my post designed to be as general as possible.
Like you, I will be thrilled if/when a P2V tool can finally handle the HAL conversion correctly!
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 at 11:29 pm
slowe
Thanks, Rich. I suspected that was the case, but I wanted to see if you’d gathered information from some of the VAC resources and, if so, which ones. There’s so much information out there that it’s hard to keep track of all of it.
I appreciate you sharing your knowledge and experience with everyone.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at 1:50 pm
Travis Campbel
Oooh, thanks for the pointer to the X4500 entry. Hadn’t seen that one before.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008 at 8:01 pm
James K
Scott,
There is a P2V tool that will change the HAL on conversion (among other things) - Vizioncore vConverter. It is pay per use, but you get three free conversions with a download.
Disclaimer: I work for Vizioncore.
Thursday, June 19, 2008 at 8:18 am
slowe
James K,
I appreciate you letting us know and being up-front about your affiliation. I was not aware that vConverter took care of the HAL issue during the conversion. Thanks for reading and commenting!
Monday, June 23, 2008 at 8:01 am
Patrick
Scott,
PlateSpin PowerConvert also handles all Hal and Kernel changes when going from multi to single, Single to Multi, etc….
Disclaimer: I work for PlateSpin..
Patrick
Monday, June 23, 2008 at 8:25 am
slowe
Patrick,
Again, thanks for being up-front with your affiliation. I appreciate you letting my readers and me know about this functionality within PowerConvert.
One question for you: IIRC, PlateSpin charges on a per-conversion basis for PowerConvert. How do you handle “failed” conversions? Is the customer charged for even those?
Monday, June 23, 2008 at 9:12 am
Patrick
It depends on the step in the migration process if a license is used or not.. When the migration failes in a very early step the license will not be burned… When the migration stops at a later step and the license is burned but the migration failes afterall you should work with our support team to see if the failed migration can be fixed and else a new license will be provided.
Patrick