<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Converter Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/comment-page-1/#comment-37523</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/#comment-37523</guid>
		<description>The new 3.0.3 version is excellent, even though it is a &#039;point&#039; upgrade, I&#039;d consider it a very nice enhancement to 3.0.2-U1...  

There are a host of fixed and new things but the biggest one for me (which admittedly I haven&#039;t tested yet) is the ability to handle Windows software RAID without having to break the mirrors first (some people back in the late 90&#039;s thought the crappy MS software raid was a high-availability sensible solution)...

Any news on what will be in v4 ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new 3.0.3 version is excellent, even though it is a &#8216;point&#8217; upgrade, I&#8217;d consider it a very nice enhancement to 3.0.2-U1&#8230;  </p>
<p>There are a host of fixed and new things but the biggest one for me (which admittedly I haven&#8217;t tested yet) is the ability to handle Windows software RAID without having to break the mirrors first (some people back in the late 90&#8242;s thought the crappy MS software raid was a high-availability sensible solution)&#8230;</p>
<p>Any news on what will be in v4 ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henk</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/comment-page-1/#comment-37484</link>
		<dc:creator>Henk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 11:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/vmware-converter-update/#comment-37484</guid>
		<description>One of the best features (imo) is:

convert individual volumes on a single physical disk from the source physical machine to separate and independent virtual disks across different datastores

Hope this will be available in Converter 4 soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best features (imo) is:</p>
<p>convert individual volumes on a single physical disk from the source physical machine to separate and independent virtual disks across different datastores</p>
<p>Hope this will be available in Converter 4 soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

