<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualization Short Take #7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/comment-page-1/#comment-38023</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/#comment-38023</guid>
		<description>Will definately be interested to see what Vmware&#039;s new certifaction entails (especially as an instructor as well as being a VCP)!

It&#039;s probably done the rounds already, but:
http://invurted.com/hypervisorcomp.pdf
an interesting comparisom of Vmware and Xen.

Great blog, by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will definately be interested to see what Vmware&#8217;s new certifaction entails (especially as an instructor as well as being a VCP)!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably done the rounds already, but:<br />
<a href="http://invurted.com/hypervisorcomp.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://invurted.com/hypervisorcomp.pdf</a><br />
an interesting comparisom of Vmware and Xen.</p>
<p>Great blog, by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37906</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/#comment-37906</guid>
		<description>Jack,

You&#039;d really want to compare ESX to Xen in order to get a good feel for how the two products compare. In addition, you&#039;ll want to install VMware&#039;s paravirtualized drivers (called VMware Tools), which are comparable to the PV drivers offered by some Xen vendors (Novell, Citrix, and Virtual Iron spring to mind).

I don&#039;t think that Hyper-V is based on Xen, although I do think they share a lot of architectural similarities. Somehow the idea of Microsoft basing their code on an open source project just doesn&#039;t seem to gel....

Anyway, thanks for reading and thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack,</p>
<p>You&#8217;d really want to compare ESX to Xen in order to get a good feel for how the two products compare. In addition, you&#8217;ll want to install VMware&#8217;s paravirtualized drivers (called VMware Tools), which are comparable to the PV drivers offered by some Xen vendors (Novell, Citrix, and Virtual Iron spring to mind).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that Hyper-V is based on Xen, although I do think they share a lot of architectural similarities. Somehow the idea of Microsoft basing their code on an open source project just doesn&#8217;t seem to gel&#8230;.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for reading and thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/comment-page-1/#comment-37898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/05/07/virtualization-short-take-7/#comment-37898</guid>
		<description>Hello, read the article of GSNW, and I agree with the writer.  However I come from a linux/Solaris background, and our VM of choice is XEN (generally speaking).  Citrix owns the XEN group now, however the core is still open source, and from what I understand HyperV is based on XEN.  I&#039;ve personally used VMWare Server (not ESX) and compared it to XEN just to see, and it&#039;s hard to prove, but there are random slowdowns with VMWare.  In XEN I never know it&#039;s a VM, in VMWare, I&#039;m painfully aware.  It&#039;s in this frame of thought where I hope M$ chooses the best VM platform out there, and for linux, it&#039;s certainly XEN (imho).  Probably I cant configure VMWare perfectly, but the lack of direct drive usage or even bare partitions in VMWare is a major issue to me - that&#039;s just plain aggravating. Ah well,  I don&#039;t do that much with XEN either, mostly use LVM for partition mgmt, etc. 

thanks for your column, looks like a nice blog in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, read the article of GSNW, and I agree with the writer.  However I come from a linux/Solaris background, and our VM of choice is XEN (generally speaking).  Citrix owns the XEN group now, however the core is still open source, and from what I understand HyperV is based on XEN.  I&#8217;ve personally used VMWare Server (not ESX) and compared it to XEN just to see, and it&#8217;s hard to prove, but there are random slowdowns with VMWare.  In XEN I never know it&#8217;s a VM, in VMWare, I&#8217;m painfully aware.  It&#8217;s in this frame of thought where I hope M$ chooses the best VM platform out there, and for linux, it&#8217;s certainly XEN (imho).  Probably I cant configure VMWare perfectly, but the lack of direct drive usage or even bare partitions in VMWare is a major issue to me &#8211; that&#8217;s just plain aggravating. Ah well,  I don&#8217;t do that much with XEN either, mostly use LVM for partition mgmt, etc. </p>
<p>thanks for your column, looks like a nice blog in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

