Comments on: Stolen Content http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/ The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:34:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: slowe http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/comment-page-1/#comment-40704 slowe Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:54:27 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/#comment-40704 Benjamin, That's a good idea, I'll have to take a look at that link. Thanks for the suggestion! Benjamin,

That’s a good idea, I’ll have to take a look at that link. Thanks for the suggestion!

]]> By: benjamin http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/comment-page-1/#comment-40701 benjamin Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:52:39 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/#comment-40701 These days we find many blog/website that simply republishes the RSS feeds. Digital Inspiration shares a tip that can help to some extent. The advice is to add the link to the article in the rss feed http://www.labnol.org/internet/blogging/spam-websites-republish-blog-rss-feeds/4241/ These days we find many blog/website that simply republishes the RSS feeds.
Digital Inspiration shares a tip that can help to some extent. The advice is to add the link to the article in the rss feed
http://www.labnol.org/internet/blogging/spam-websites-republish-blog-rss-feeds/4241/

]]> By: slowe http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/comment-page-1/#comment-37248 slowe Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:36:16 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/#comment-37248 I doubt that it is a site that many people frequent, and upon browsing the site today it appears that the site's owner removed all the plagiarized content that I identified. There is still one entry that he clearly plagiarized from my site, but as it was a small posting of no real technical value I didn't say anything about it (and don't plan to). I'll take the high road and assume that the gentleman running the site wasn't aware of the guidelines around republishing content. If I want others to think the best of me and give me the benefit of the doubt, then the least I can do is the same. Thanks for reading and thanks for your feedback! I doubt that it is a site that many people frequent, and upon browsing the site today it appears that the site’s owner removed all the plagiarized content that I identified. There is still one entry that he clearly plagiarized from my site, but as it was a small posting of no real technical value I didn’t say anything about it (and don’t plan to).

I’ll take the high road and assume that the gentleman running the site wasn’t aware of the guidelines around republishing content. If I want others to think the best of me and give me the benefit of the doubt, then the least I can do is the same.

Thanks for reading and thanks for your feedback!

]]> By: David Lee http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/comment-page-1/#comment-37247 David Lee Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:27:57 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/22/stolen-content/#comment-37247 Scott, I wish you'd consider telling us what site plagiarized your work. I'd like to steer clear of that site. Thanks so much for sharing your technical knowledge on your blog, but thanks even more for your witness. David in Raleigh Scott, I wish you’d consider telling us what site plagiarized your work. I’d like to steer clear of that site.

Thanks so much for sharing your technical knowledge on your blog, but thanks even more for your witness.

David in Raleigh

]]>