Comments on: Quick Migration Revisited http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/03/quick-migration-revisited/ The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:15:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: JoseRuelas http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/03/quick-migration-revisited/#comment-36869 JoseRuelas Fri, 04 Apr 2008 03:37:09 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/03/quick-migration-revisited/#comment-36869 the only way I can see that could avoid this type of behaviour is that Microsoft needs to add something like VMotion. What do you think? the only way I can see that could avoid this type of behaviour is that Microsoft needs to add something like VMotion.

What do you think?

]]> By: stu http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/03/quick-migration-revisited/#comment-36857 stu Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:59:30 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/04/03/quick-migration-revisited/#comment-36857 As far as I can tell, this is exactly how the Quick migration service is sold - it's a pause in service while the migration takes place. If the application you're running can't deal with a pause in service (i.e. the server disppearing for that time) then it will fail. The demo shows exactly expected behaviour. All that really means is that you have to plan for your migrations to take place. As far as I can tell, this is exactly how the Quick migration service is sold - it’s a pause in service while the migration takes place. If the application you’re running can’t deal with a pause in service (i.e. the server disppearing for that time) then it will fail. The demo shows exactly expected behaviour. All that really means is that you have to plan for your migrations to take place.

]]>