<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Love It, But It&#8217;s Not Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Sorokin</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/comment-page-1/#comment-35838</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Sorokin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/#comment-35838</guid>
		<description>SnapManger for Virtual Infrastructure will be available in April this year and will cost $2000 per server according to this source:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/12/netapp_announcements_feb_12/

Dmitry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SnapManger for Virtual Infrastructure will be available in April this year and will cost $2000 per server according to this source:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/12/netapp_announcements_feb_12/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/12/netapp_announcements_feb_12/</a></p>
<p>Dmitry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/comment-page-1/#comment-35835</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/#comment-35835</guid>
		<description>NetApp *IS* cool technology, no doubt about it. I love most of their stuff. I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve read my earlier articles on FlexClones?

http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/11/how-to-provision-vms-using-netapp-flexclones/
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/15/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-1/
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/17/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-2/

I just hope that the dates that I&#039;ve been given for delivery of this next-generation usage of the cloning functionality are accurate; this is something they&#039;ve been hyping for quite a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NetApp *IS* cool technology, no doubt about it. I love most of their stuff. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve read my earlier articles on FlexClones?</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/11/how-to-provision-vms-using-netapp-flexclones/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/11/how-to-provision-vms-using-netapp-flexclones/</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/15/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-1/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/15/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-1/</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/17/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-2/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/05/17/netapp-flexclones-with-vmware-part-2/</a></p>
<p>I just hope that the dates that I&#8217;ve been given for delivery of this next-generation usage of the cloning functionality are accurate; this is something they&#8217;ve been hyping for quite a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bishop</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/comment-page-1/#comment-35833</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bishop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/02/28/i-love-it-but-its-not-available/#comment-35833</guid>
		<description>The primary difference is that vmware doesn&#039;t really do &quot;vaporware&quot;. They don&#039;t really talk about something until they have already gotten through most testing and small deployments and are ready for release. Something might hold it back, but they&#039;re almost always on target. Due to NDA, I can&#039;t be specific, but most of the stuff they&#039;ve been hyping for the last few months and saying 2nd or 3rd quarter 2008....Is really 3rd quarter. The stuff that is sexy, thin provision, linked clones, etc. I&#039;m excited about the stuff. Microsoft, no one takes seriously anymore, and it makes sense--they always talk, but rarely do the things they create ever live up to their hype, and NEVER on time, usually off by years if we&#039;re honest about it.

Netapp, was different, but maybe they&#039;ll release this soon enough to not get a black eye over it.
I don&#039;t have netapp, I have EMC and IBM, but I&#039;ve always thought of netapp as cool technology. I&#039;d love to have it in-house one day, and something like that might persuade, as we&#039;re a very virtual shop...and that&#039;s just amazing to anyone who&#039;s done much provisioning of vm&#039;s(we&#039;ll be in the multi thousands soon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary difference is that vmware doesn&#8217;t really do &#8220;vaporware&#8221;. They don&#8217;t really talk about something until they have already gotten through most testing and small deployments and are ready for release. Something might hold it back, but they&#8217;re almost always on target. Due to NDA, I can&#8217;t be specific, but most of the stuff they&#8217;ve been hyping for the last few months and saying 2nd or 3rd quarter 2008&#8230;.Is really 3rd quarter. The stuff that is sexy, thin provision, linked clones, etc. I&#8217;m excited about the stuff. Microsoft, no one takes seriously anymore, and it makes sense&#8211;they always talk, but rarely do the things they create ever live up to their hype, and NEVER on time, usually off by years if we&#8217;re honest about it.</p>
<p>Netapp, was different, but maybe they&#8217;ll release this soon enough to not get a black eye over it.<br />
I don&#8217;t have netapp, I have EMC and IBM, but I&#8217;ve always thought of netapp as cool technology. I&#8217;d love to have it in-house one day, and something like that might persuade, as we&#8217;re a very virtual shop&#8230;and that&#8217;s just amazing to anyone who&#8217;s done much provisioning of vm&#8217;s(we&#8217;ll be in the multi thousands soon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

