Comments on: Mac RDP Client Wishlist http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/ The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:48:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Michael http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-36389 Michael Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:51:20 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-36389 Try CORD out. It does most of the things you want. Try CORD out. It does most of the things you want.

]]> By: Greg http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-35885 Greg Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:31:53 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-35885 @wing figgles Windows 2008 Terminal Services RemoteApp requires the ActiveX control only available via the Remote Desktop Connection client version 6.1. Only Windows 2008, Vista SP1 and XP SP3 have this client. Not to mention that ActiveX will never work natively on a Mac anyway... @wing figgles

Windows 2008 Terminal Services RemoteApp requires the ActiveX control only available via the Remote Desktop Connection client version 6.1. Only Windows 2008, Vista SP1 and XP SP3 have this client. Not to mention that ActiveX will never work natively on a Mac anyway…

]]> By: wing figgles http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-35090 wing figgles Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:34:49 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-35090 in Server 2008 you can publish apps natively via RDP so cmd or powershell can be easily accessed via the web. Just like Citrix PS does today. in Server 2008 you can publish apps natively via RDP so cmd or powershell can be easily accessed via the web. Just like Citrix PS does today.

]]> By: slowe http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34907 slowe Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:51:29 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34907 The old Microsoft client allowed you to push Option (or Command, I can't recall) to connect to the Console session for Windows Server 2003. I don't have a Windows Server machine handy right now to test the new version, but I'm guessing that behavior didn't make it? The old Microsoft client allowed you to push Option (or Command, I can’t recall) to connect to the Console session for Windows Server 2003. I don’t have a Windows Server machine handy right now to test the new version, but I’m guessing that behavior didn’t make it?

]]> By: Ausmith1 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34903 Ausmith1 Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:20:08 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34903 I'd like to have console session support for 2003 and 2008 servers, if it's in the new MS RDP beta client, I sure can't find it... I’d like to have console session support for 2003 and 2008 servers, if it’s in the new MS RDP beta client, I sure can’t find it…

]]> By: Derek Morr http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34891 Derek Morr Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:01:23 +0000 http://blog.scottlowe.org/2008/01/02/mac-rdp-client-wishlist/#comment-34891 I agree with everything on your list. MS's RDP 2.0 client is close, but not quiet there yet. One thing I'd like to see that isn't on your list is IPv6 support. I agree with everything on your list. MS’s RDP 2.0 client is close, but not quiet there yet. One thing I’d like to see that isn’t on your list is IPv6 support.

]]>