<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CentOS 5 Active Directory Integration Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike H</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-39475</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-39475</guid>
		<description>SELinux enable disable techniques:

 1. To see whether or not selinux is enforcing, permissive or disabled
$ sudo /usr/sbin/getenforce

 2. To temporarily set selinux to permissive (doesn't enforce any policies but will log alerts to syslog)
$ sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce 0

 3. To set selinux back to enforcing
$ sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce 1

 4. To permanently disable selinux (survives next reboot) edit /etc/selinux/config and change:
SELINUX=enforcing
to
SELINUX=permissive

permissive is nice because you can use it to debug selinux policy issues</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SELinux enable disable techniques:</p>
<p> 1. To see whether or not selinux is enforcing, permissive or disabled<br />
$ sudo /usr/sbin/getenforce</p>
<p> 2. To temporarily set selinux to permissive (doesn&#8217;t enforce any policies but will log alerts to syslog)<br />
$ sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce 0</p>
<p> 3. To set selinux back to enforcing<br />
$ sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce 1</p>
<p> 4. To permanently disable selinux (survives next reboot) edit /etc/selinux/config and change:<br />
SELINUX=enforcing<br />
to<br />
SELINUX=permissive</p>
<p>permissive is nice because you can use it to debug selinux policy issues</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-39398</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-39398</guid>
		<description>I found this post useful
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/kerberos-kinit-reply-did-not-match-expectations-445698/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this post useful<br />
<a href="http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/kerberos-kinit-reply-did-not-match-expectations-445698/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-networking-3/kerberos-kinit-reply-did-not-match-expectations-445698/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurizio</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37244</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37244</guid>
		<description>Others of you has tried to make rpm binary using sources?
i got
"Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/samba-3.0.28a-1.i386.rpm"
and all the others samba packages 3.0.28a
but now i am very worried to install them on thsi Centos 5.1

Someone did it and he is satisfied?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Others of you has tried to make rpm binary using sources?<br />
i got<br />
&#8220;Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/samba-3.0.28a-1.i386.rpm&#8221;<br />
and all the others samba packages 3.0.28a<br />
but now i am very worried to install them on thsi Centos 5.1</p>
<p>Someone did it and he is satisfied?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurizio</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37243</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37243</guid>
		<description>3.0.25a is bugged for other reasons, too :(
As Graham pointed here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-March/139428.html
"After groping around in the dark, I found some references to ldap passwd 
sync being broken, and changing this worked:

ldap passwd sync = no

For some reason, ldap passwd sync seems to be broken on samba 3.0.25b."
i have the same issue, i can't change password using CtrlAltCanc Windows form</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.0.25a is bugged for other reasons, too <img src='http://blog.scottlowe.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
As Graham pointed here:<br />
<a href="http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-March/139428.html" rel="nofollow">http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2008-March/139428.html</a><br />
&#8220;After groping around in the dark, I found some references to ldap passwd<br />
sync being broken, and changing this worked:</p>
<p>ldap passwd sync = no</p>
<p>For some reason, ldap passwd sync seems to be broken on samba 3.0.25b.&#8221;<br />
i have the same issue, i can&#8217;t change password using CtrlAltCanc Windows form</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37062</link>
		<dc:creator>Albe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37062</guid>
		<description>Solution for the first post: just go for the firstconfig procedure (u can relaunch by /usr/sbin/firstconfig --reconfig) and in the firewall section disable the SELinux.

This fixed this as well as other issues with my installation...


Albe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solution for the first post: just go for the firstconfig procedure (u can relaunch by /usr/sbin/firstconfig &#8211;reconfig) and in the firewall section disable the SELinux.</p>
<p>This fixed this as well as other issues with my installation&#8230;</p>
<p>Albe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37006</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-37006</guid>
		<description>I was able to get my RHEL 5 machine added to the AD Domain.  I am currently on RHEL 5.1 (/etc/redhat-release).  So I'm wondering what I did that was different from the instructions?  I am having a issue where my Samba server is having Windows XP machines (Not in the AD domain) to enter in there username and password every hour or so.  I was wondering if anyone else is having this issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was able to get my RHEL 5 machine added to the AD Domain.  I am currently on RHEL 5.1 (/etc/redhat-release).  So I&#8217;m wondering what I did that was different from the instructions?  I am having a issue where my Samba server is having Windows XP machines (Not in the AD domain) to enter in there username and password every hour or so.  I was wondering if anyone else is having this issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveL</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-35517</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-35517</guid>
		<description>Having a similar problem, only at the next step:  the join works, but then getent doesn't return the user / group info from ADS.  I'd just posted a question to the Samba mail list  when I found this blog entry.

DaveL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a similar problem, only at the next step:  the join works, but then getent doesn&#8217;t return the user / group info from ADS.  I&#8217;d just posted a question to the Samba mail list  when I found this blog entry.</p>
<p>DaveL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanK</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34988</link>
		<dc:creator>IanK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34988</guid>
		<description>I got net ads join to work by upgrading Samba to a newer version than 3.0.25b.

The problem with the password prompt after obtaining a ticket and trying to use the root user is a bug in the Samba distribution from yum install samba using default mirrors in Cent0S 5. The version CentOS 5 comes with is Version 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4. There was a Samba version update that would fix this, version 3.0.26 and sequentially 3.0.26a and now 3.0.28 is the most recent. The bug is described here: http://enterpriselinuxlog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/09/11/of-samba-bugs-and-3026a/

Also check the samba installation documentation to ensure you have compiled Samba correctly for CentOS 5. Look at the Compiling Samba With Active Directory support document here:
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/compiling.html

Love your site. 

IanK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got net ads join to work by upgrading Samba to a newer version than 3.0.25b.</p>
<p>The problem with the password prompt after obtaining a ticket and trying to use the root user is a bug in the Samba distribution from yum install samba using default mirrors in Cent0S 5. The version CentOS 5 comes with is Version 3.0.25b-1.el5_1.4. There was a Samba version update that would fix this, version 3.0.26 and sequentially 3.0.26a and now 3.0.28 is the most recent. The bug is described here: <a href="http://enterpriselinuxlog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/09/11/of-samba-bugs-and-3026a/" rel="nofollow">http://enterpriselinuxlog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/09/11/of-samba-bugs-and-3026a/</a></p>
<p>Also check the samba installation documentation to ensure you have compiled Samba correctly for CentOS 5. Look at the Compiling Samba With Active Directory support document here:<br />
<a href="http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/compiling.html" rel="nofollow">http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/compiling.html</a></p>
<p>Love your site. </p>
<p>IanK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34718</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34718</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Good question. We certainly could use LDAP for authentication, but using Kerberos also allows us to leverage Kerberos' design for authenticating to other services as well.

You are correct, though--LDAP should work in this scenario.

Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Good question. We certainly could use LDAP for authentication, but using Kerberos also allows us to leverage Kerberos&#8217; design for authenticating to other services as well.</p>
<p>You are correct, though&#8211;LDAP should work in this scenario.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34715</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/12/04/centos-5-active-directory-integration-problem/#comment-34715</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question why do you use pam_krb to do the authenticating as doesn't pam_ldap do the same thing? I'm probably wrong but I just thought I would ask.

Thanks for a fantastic site.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question why do you use pam_krb to do the authenticating as doesn&#8217;t pam_ldap do the same thing? I&#8217;m probably wrong but I just thought I would ask.</p>
<p>Thanks for a fantastic site.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
