<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Potential Issue in AD Integration Scenarios</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave McLeod</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-36602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave McLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-36602</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,
I tried using your Solaris AD integration with somany attempts sometimes I get locked out sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't when it worked I was able to make winbindd daemon to start but when the Administrator account was the only account that could log-in other users couldn't. I have re-installed Solaris 10 many times (I guess I'm enjoying the luxury of VMs)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,<br />
I tried using your Solaris AD integration with somany attempts sometimes I get locked out sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn&#8217;t when it worked I was able to make winbindd daemon to start but when the Administrator account was the only account that could log-in other users couldn&#8217;t. I have re-installed Solaris 10 many times (I guess I&#8217;m enjoying the luxury of VMs)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-35841</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-35841</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for taking the time to write the articles about AD integration. I am having a problem that sounds like what is described here regarding the one-potential-issue... but I am having trouble translating the _two ways of specifying this account in /etc/ldap.conf_ into the actual lines in that file. Could you share some typical examples of the line(s) in ldap.conf for the bind account (and/or whatever other info in ldap.conf may be affected by this). Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for taking the time to write the articles about AD integration. I am having a problem that sounds like what is described here regarding the one-potential-issue&#8230; but I am having trouble translating the _two ways of specifying this account in /etc/ldap.conf_ into the actual lines in that file. Could you share some typical examples of the line(s) in ldap.conf for the bind account (and/or whatever other info in ldap.conf may be affected by this). Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac439</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33865</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac439</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33865</guid>
		<description>Hey there! Very nice article you have here. If anyone was having problems understanding more about Kerberos, there is a good article on it here:
http://www.learn-networking.com/security-basics/how-kerberos-authentication-works.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there! Very nice article you have here. If anyone was having problems understanding more about Kerberos, there is a good article on it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.learn-networking.com/security-basics/how-kerberos-authentication-works.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.learn-networking.com/security-basics/how-kerberos-authentication-works.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33483</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33483</guid>
		<description>Clif,

Well, without NSS you're kind of stuck.  Sorry--wish I could be more helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif,</p>
<p>Well, without NSS you&#8217;re kind of stuck.  Sorry&#8211;wish I could be more helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33481</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33481</guid>
		<description>As of AIX 5.2 a year or so ago, I don't believe NSS was supported.  As well, I believe PAM was supported only through AIX's LAM.  I've since migrated most of my 5.2 systems so hopefully this has all changed.  Having said that, I tried a howto a couple of months back using 5.3 and still failed to get it going.  :^(

It simply shouldn't be an issue.  At this point it should be little more than a "checkbox".  (Said the tired admin)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of AIX 5.2 a year or so ago, I don&#8217;t believe NSS was supported.  As well, I believe PAM was supported only through AIX&#8217;s LAM.  I&#8217;ve since migrated most of my 5.2 systems so hopefully this has all changed.  Having said that, I tried a howto a couple of months back using 5.3 and still failed to get it going.  :^(</p>
<p>It simply shouldn&#8217;t be an issue.  At this point it should be little more than a &#8220;checkbox&#8221;.  (Said the tired admin)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33429</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33429</guid>
		<description>Clif,

I wish I could help with AIX! Unfortunately, I know absolutely nothing about how AIX works...does it support PAM and NSS? OpenBSD does not, for example, which completely prevents any sort of broad AD integration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clif,</p>
<p>I wish I could help with AIX! Unfortunately, I know absolutely nothing about how AIX works&#8230;does it support PAM and NSS? OpenBSD does not, for example, which completely prevents any sort of broad AD integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clif Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33425</link>
		<dc:creator>Clif Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/17/one-potential-issue-in-ad-integration-scenarios/#comment-33425</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the continued info and updates to it!  I must say I'm disappointed that we UNIX/Linux admins still have to jump through so many complicated hoops when (unfortunately) AD has been the defacto authenticator for a number of years now. While I've been successful with Linux and Solaris, my attempts at integrating AIX continue to cause me to fall on my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the continued info and updates to it!  I must say I&#8217;m disappointed that we UNIX/Linux admins still have to jump through so many complicated hoops when (unfortunately) AD has been the defacto authenticator for a number of years now. While I&#8217;ve been successful with Linux and Solaris, my attempts at integrating AIX continue to cause me to fall on my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
