<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enhanced VMotion Announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prashant Prahlad</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-35857</link>
		<dc:creator>Prashant Prahlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/#comment-35857</guid>
		<description>Another source of information about CPU compatibility for VMotion, and Enhanced VMotion is the VMware info guide:

http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/1022</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another source of information about CPU compatibility for VMotion, and Enhanced VMotion is the VMware info guide:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/1022" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/1022</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-35154</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/#comment-35154</guid>
		<description>William,

The last information I heard was that ESX 3.5 would add support for the AMD and Intel hardware support. I have not, however, seen any formal documentation or mention of that support in the VMware info about ESX 3.5, so I don&#039;t know if that is still the case or not.

This post has more information on CPU masking, which is unsupported but may help:

http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/19/more-on-cpu-masking/

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>The last information I heard was that ESX 3.5 would add support for the AMD and Intel hardware support. I have not, however, seen any formal documentation or mention of that support in the VMware info about ESX 3.5, so I don&#8217;t know if that is still the case or not.</p>
<p>This post has more information on CPU masking, which is unsupported but may help:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/19/more-on-cpu-masking/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/19/more-on-cpu-masking/</a></p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Patton</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-35141</link>
		<dc:creator>William Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/#comment-35141</guid>
		<description>Scott,
Have you heard any more information on &quot;Enhanced VMotion&quot;?
This is something we battle frequently at work with customer&#039;s having multiple architectures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,<br />
Have you heard any more information on &#8220;Enhanced VMotion&#8221;?<br />
This is something we battle frequently at work with customer&#8217;s having multiple architectures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-33346</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/09/12/enhanced-vmotion-announcement/#comment-33346</guid>
		<description>Yes, the assumption that VMware&#039;s Enhanced VMotion is built on top of AMD and Intel&#039;s hardware support is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the assumption that VMware&#8217;s Enhanced VMotion is built on top of AMD and Intel&#8217;s hardware support is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

