<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moving ESX Into Firmware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:13:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guncel</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-45503</link>
		<dc:creator>guncel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-45503</guid>
		<description>I just have a T2000, i wish i could read this post before i have. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have a T2000, i wish i could read this post before i have. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-39553</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-39553</guid>
		<description>All,

Obviously things have changed quite a bit since this was posted, and ESXi has been fully released. People now understand what it is, and what it isn&#039;t, and it&#039;s more clear now how the OEMs are marketing it and supplying it with their hardware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All,</p>
<p>Obviously things have changed quite a bit since this was posted, and ESXi has been fully released. People now understand what it is, and what it isn&#8217;t, and it&#8217;s more clear now how the OEMs are marketing it and supplying it with their hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-39539</link>
		<dc:creator>freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-39539</guid>
		<description>Go EMC.. Way better than SUN!! Sorry. Realize that may be a very unpopular thing to say. But that&#039;s my opinion on this...  Sure, Dell had some major problems when they went into this, but they pulled back and pushed EMC and the stuff has been solid ever since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go EMC.. Way better than SUN!! Sorry. Realize that may be a very unpopular thing to say. But that&#8217;s my opinion on this&#8230;  Sure, Dell had some major problems when they went into this, but they pulled back and pushed EMC and the stuff has been solid ever since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-33587</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-33587</guid>
		<description>EMC already sells their SANs through DELL so I do not see how this is going to be any different. The Current SANs retain the EMC name so I would imagine it will simply be marketed as a PowerEdge server with ESX technology. In addition you will need to purchase virtual center to take advantange of the HA and DR pieces of the picture. My question is: are you loosing anything by going with the Firmware version? Will it still support Vmotion and the other features that the disk based version has. I have not found any firm information on this yet so it will be interesting to see what the features are when VMware makes the official release announcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMC already sells their SANs through DELL so I do not see how this is going to be any different. The Current SANs retain the EMC name so I would imagine it will simply be marketed as a PowerEdge server with ESX technology. In addition you will need to purchase virtual center to take advantange of the HA and DR pieces of the picture. My question is: are you loosing anything by going with the Firmware version? Will it still support Vmotion and the other features that the disk based version has. I have not found any firm information on this yet so it will be interesting to see what the features are when VMware makes the official release announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-32761</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-32761</guid>
		<description>Matt,

Do you mean &quot;indistinguishable&quot;, or are you saying that the functionality Sun is including in the T2000 will be noticeably different from hard partitioning?  If this functionality will be different, I&#039;m curious to know the ways in which it will be different, and what the limitations and advantages are to each approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,</p>
<p>Do you mean &#8220;indistinguishable&#8221;, or are you saying that the functionality Sun is including in the T2000 will be noticeably different from hard partitioning?  If this functionality will be different, I&#8217;m curious to know the ways in which it will be different, and what the limitations and advantages are to each approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/comment-page-1/#comment-32752</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 05:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/06/15/moving-esx-into-firmware/#comment-32752</guid>
		<description>This is what SUN is doing in their forthcoming T2000 series servers. The virtualization happens in firmware and is distinguishable from their other tricks like hard partitioning on the BIG iron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what SUN is doing in their forthcoming T2000 series servers. The virtualization happens in firmware and is distinguishable from their other tricks like hard partitioning on the BIG iron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

