<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Defections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aanbiedingen</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/comment-page-1/#comment-34938</link>
		<dc:creator>Aanbiedingen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=415#comment-34938</guid>
		<description>use SP3, I tried it today!
definately performance increase</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>use SP3, I tried it today!<br />
definately performance increase</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junkie</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/comment-page-1/#comment-27536</link>
		<dc:creator>junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=415#comment-27536</guid>
		<description>Part of what is going I&#039;d chalk up to XP fatigue and people having really bad experiences with viruses. Personally, I think the trend will decrease with Vista on the market. People will want to at least check it out and its pretty cool in terms of look as feel. I still think the Mac is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of what is going I&#8217;d chalk up to XP fatigue and people having really bad experiences with viruses. Personally, I think the trend will decrease with Vista on the market. People will want to at least check it out and its pretty cool in terms of look as feel. I still think the Mac is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peter Reed</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/comment-page-1/#comment-27530</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peter Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=415#comment-27530</guid>
		<description>The only constant is change. But when change happens for the sake of change, it&#039;s time for a real change. That&#039;s what&#039;s happening. Whether it will reach tipping point and critical mass .... not any time soon. Inertia is a powerful force to be reckoned with.

Don&#039;t fear change. Change fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only constant is change. But when change happens for the sake of change, it&#8217;s time for a real change. That&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening. Whether it will reach tipping point and critical mass &#8230;. not any time soon. Inertia is a powerful force to be reckoned with.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t fear change. Change fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom B</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/comment-page-1/#comment-27503</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=415#comment-27503</guid>
		<description>Anecdotally, I&#039;ve have two friends, with NO prodding from me, buy Macs. I am a big Mac fan, from 1989, but more so now that the gap between Mac and Windows has widened with the release of OS X.

Yet, Apple&#039;s Mac sales weren&#039;t amazingly &quot;off the curve&quot; last quarter. I think it will take some time to see if large-scale switching or &quot;adding&quot; is really taking place.

Some of it is, no doubt, the internet noise factor. If I have a scratch on my lapop EVERYBODY in the world can know about it TOMORROW, if I post it on  a blog-- even if most laptops don&#039;t have scratches. Same with &quot;switchers&quot; or anything else.

As for Mac Vs. Ubuntu-- in my view they are both a big step up from Windows; kudos to anyone who upgrades to either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anecdotally, I&#8217;ve have two friends, with NO prodding from me, buy Macs. I am a big Mac fan, from 1989, but more so now that the gap between Mac and Windows has widened with the release of OS X.</p>
<p>Yet, Apple&#8217;s Mac sales weren&#8217;t amazingly &#8220;off the curve&#8221; last quarter. I think it will take some time to see if large-scale switching or &#8220;adding&#8221; is really taking place.</p>
<p>Some of it is, no doubt, the internet noise factor. If I have a scratch on my lapop EVERYBODY in the world can know about it TOMORROW, if I post it on  a blog&#8211; even if most laptops don&#8217;t have scratches. Same with &#8220;switchers&#8221; or anything else.</p>
<p>As for Mac Vs. Ubuntu&#8211; in my view they are both a big step up from Windows; kudos to anyone who upgrades to either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frog</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/02/19/windows-defections/comment-page-1/#comment-27500</link>
		<dc:creator>Frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=415#comment-27500</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s two things:

(1) the release of Vista implies a hardware upgrade (I know it can run on lower-end systems -- with a speed hit -- but most people won&#039;t upgrade unless forced to or via a hardware purchase, and the power users will want the newer kit anyway); this gives people an opportunity to look around, see what else is out there. Since they have to move on anyway, it&#039;s a great time to a serious look at the Mac.

(2) Once they look, they can see that Mac hardware is very low-risk commitment; you can now run Windows on it if you need to or want to. And it&#039;s the most modern and reliable hardware available. And there isn&#039;t a &quot;Mac tax&quot; anymore; Apple&#039;s prices are competitive.

Also, I have yet to see anyone doing a comparison decide that Vista is superior to the Mac. At most, they seem to be considered equals. Usually, the Mac wins for sheer elegance, though. It&#039;s like I missed some.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s two things:</p>
<p>(1) the release of Vista implies a hardware upgrade (I know it can run on lower-end systems &#8212; with a speed hit &#8212; but most people won&#8217;t upgrade unless forced to or via a hardware purchase, and the power users will want the newer kit anyway); this gives people an opportunity to look around, see what else is out there. Since they have to move on anyway, it&#8217;s a great time to a serious look at the Mac.</p>
<p>(2) Once they look, they can see that Mac hardware is very low-risk commitment; you can now run Windows on it if you need to or want to. And it&#8217;s the most modern and reliable hardware available. And there isn&#8217;t a &#8220;Mac tax&#8221; anymore; Apple&#8217;s prices are competitive.</p>
<p>Also, I have yet to see anyone doing a comparison decide that Vista is superior to the Mac. At most, they seem to be considered equals. Usually, the Mac wins for sheer elegance, though. It&#8217;s like I missed some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

