<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware HA in Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-48059</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=405#comment-48059</guid>
		<description>Amal,

In this particular case, vCenter was physical. However, to answer your question, VMware HA will continue to work---once it has been configured---even when vCenter Server is unavailable. This is one of the reasons why running vCenter Server as a VM might offer benefits, in that VMware HA can help provide availability for vCenter Server itself.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amal,</p>
<p>In this particular case, vCenter was physical. However, to answer your question, VMware HA will continue to work&#8212;once it has been configured&#8212;even when vCenter Server is unavailable. This is one of the reasons why running vCenter Server as a VM might offer benefits, in that VMware HA can help provide availability for vCenter Server itself.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amal</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-48058</link>
		<dc:creator>Amal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=405#comment-48058</guid>
		<description>Question... were you running your Virtual Center / vCenter Server as a VM on the host that failed? I&#039;m running a similar 2 host setup, and all the VMs run comfortably on a single host, including my virtualized vCenter Server instance. If that host crashes, are the hosts able to carry out HA operations autonomously, without access to vCenter Server?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question&#8230; were you running your Virtual Center / vCenter Server as a VM on the host that failed? I&#8217;m running a similar 2 host setup, and all the VMs run comfortably on a single host, including my virtualized vCenter Server instance. If that host crashes, are the hosts able to carry out HA operations autonomously, without access to vCenter Server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-31649</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=405#comment-31649</guid>
		<description>Mike,

It&#039;s extremely cool, and extremely valuable to the business.  You&#039;ll have to make your own decision as to whether the cost of VI3 Enterprise is worth it to the organization.  Personally, I think that the functionality you get in the VI3 Enterprise bundle--which includes HA, DRS, VMotion, etc.--is more than worth it.  Is it worth having your workloads dynamically load balanced across all available physical hosts?  Is it worth not having downtime due to a physical host failure, like I described above?  Is it worth being able to move workloads from host to host on demand with no downtime?  Again, that&#039;s a decision you&#039;ll need to make for yourself and your own organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s extremely cool, and extremely valuable to the business.  You&#8217;ll have to make your own decision as to whether the cost of VI3 Enterprise is worth it to the organization.  Personally, I think that the functionality you get in the VI3 Enterprise bundle&#8211;which includes HA, DRS, VMotion, etc.&#8211;is more than worth it.  Is it worth having your workloads dynamically load balanced across all available physical hosts?  Is it worth not having downtime due to a physical host failure, like I described above?  Is it worth being able to move workloads from host to host on demand with no downtime?  Again, that&#8217;s a decision you&#8217;ll need to make for yourself and your own organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-31648</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 02:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=405#comment-31648</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is very, very cool.  I am concerned about the pricing though.  You make it sound like you paid for the Enterprise Infrastructure version. $$$.  Is it worth the money?  Maybe self-defeating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is very, very cool.  I am concerned about the pricing though.  You make it sound like you paid for the Enterprise Infrastructure version. $$$.  Is it worth the money?  Maybe self-defeating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PC Blade Daily Links 2007-01-24 - PC Blade Daily - Practical News and Views on Centralized Computing</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2007/01/22/vmware-ha-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-20284</link>
		<dc:creator>PC Blade Daily Links 2007-01-24 - PC Blade Daily - Practical News and Views on Centralized Computing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=405#comment-20284</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Lowe: VMware HA in Action &#8220;VMware HA had stepped in and automatically restarted all the VMs on the second host, and the other engineers who were there when the failure happened said they didnâ€™t even notice the failover.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Lowe: VMware HA in Action &#8220;VMware HA had stepped in and automatically restarted all the VMs on the second host, and the other engineers who were there when the failure happened said they didnâ€™t even notice the failover.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

