<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of the OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/</link>
	<description>The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-30161</link>
		<dc:creator>slowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=378#comment-30161</guid>
		<description>Anonymous Coward,

I&#039;ll agree that the &quot;corporate cheerleaders&quot; often do attach themselves to the latest buzzwords, and many, many times those fads are just that...fads that don&#039;t last.

I respectfully disagree that server virtualization is in that same camp.  There are too many benefits--not just IT benefits, but bottom-line business benefits--from virtualization.  I&#039;ve talked to too many companies, done too many implementations to believe that server virtualization such as that offered by VMware (even with the associated costs) doesn&#039;t offer companies real ROI and real SLA improvements.

Now, this is not to say that virtualization will *replace* the &quot;predictable, well understood&quot; techniques you mention; far from it.  I would argue with those that believe otherwise.  However, server virtualization can be a powerful complement to these and other &quot;boring&quot; technologies.

Thanks for your comment!

Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous Coward,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree that the &#8220;corporate cheerleaders&#8221; often do attach themselves to the latest buzzwords, and many, many times those fads are just that&#8230;fads that don&#8217;t last.</p>
<p>I respectfully disagree that server virtualization is in that same camp.  There are too many benefits&#8211;not just IT benefits, but bottom-line business benefits&#8211;from virtualization.  I&#8217;ve talked to too many companies, done too many implementations to believe that server virtualization such as that offered by VMware (even with the associated costs) doesn&#8217;t offer companies real ROI and real SLA improvements.</p>
<p>Now, this is not to say that virtualization will *replace* the &#8220;predictable, well understood&#8221; techniques you mention; far from it.  I would argue with those that believe otherwise.  However, server virtualization can be a powerful complement to these and other &#8220;boring&#8221; technologies.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-30093</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=378#comment-30093</guid>
		<description>Virtualization is the latest buzzword for corporate cheerleaders eager to sell the &quot;next thing&quot;. What was cool 18 months ago? SAN storage? Consolidation? whatever...

Virtualization from players like EMC/VMware aint free, and anything that modifies the kernel like Xen is doomed to failure. Good old fashioned, boring, predictable well understood techniques like failover from application-level HA, and hardware load balancing from a Cisco router will still be humming along 2 years from now it&#039;ll be embarassing that VmWare was ever thought to be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtualization is the latest buzzword for corporate cheerleaders eager to sell the &#8220;next thing&#8221;. What was cool 18 months ago? SAN storage? Consolidation? whatever&#8230;</p>
<p>Virtualization from players like EMC/VMware aint free, and anything that modifies the kernel like Xen is doomed to failure. Good old fashioned, boring, predictable well understood techniques like failover from application-level HA, and hardware load balancing from a Cisco router will still be humming along 2 years from now it&#8217;ll be embarassing that VmWare was ever thought to be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Novak</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-20889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=378#comment-20889</guid>
		<description>I think that OS innovation is already warming up thanks to virtuailzation.  See http://replicatetech.com/blog/2007/01/23/operating-system-innovation/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that OS innovation is already warming up thanks to virtuailzation.  See <a href="http://replicatetech.com/blog/2007/01/23/operating-system-innovation/" rel="nofollow">http://replicatetech.com/blog/2007/01/23/operating-system-innovation/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OS is under attack &#8230; continuing the conversation at Virtualization Daily</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>The OS is under attack &#8230; continuing the conversation at Virtualization Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=378#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>[...] First Scott Lowe as posted his thought on the subject to his blog, in a post titled the future of the OS.  I guess that depends on how you define the operating system. I tend to agree that virtualization is the future. Operating systems as they exist today simply can&#8217;t take full advantage of the powerful hardware that is coming out of Intel and AMD, with even more powerful hardware just around the corner (think quad-core CPUs). This is especially true in the datacenter, where VMware&#8217;s Virtual Infrastructure shines. In the datacenter, where multi-socket multi-core CPUs, gobs of RAM, and terabytes of SAN storage reside, virtualization (in my opinion) is a given. But what about on the desktop? Is it a forgone conclusion on the desktop as well? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Scott Lowe as posted his thought on the subject to his blog, in a post titled the future of the OS.  I guess that depends on how you define the operating system. I tend to agree that virtualization is the future. Operating systems as they exist today simply can&rsquo;t take full advantage of the powerful hardware that is coming out of Intel and AMD, with even more powerful hardware just around the corner (think quad-core CPUs). This is especially true in the datacenter, where VMware&rsquo;s Virtual Infrastructure shines. In the datacenter, where multi-socket multi-core CPUs, gobs of RAM, and terabytes of SAN storage reside, virtualization (in my opinion) is a given. But what about on the desktop? Is it a forgone conclusion on the desktop as well? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMTN Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/05/the-future-of-the-os/comment-page-1/#comment-5370</link>
		<dc:creator>VMTN Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 05:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scottlowe.org/?p=378#comment-5370</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Role of the OS on the desktop?&lt;/strong&gt;

Kimbro at Virtualization Daily and Scott Lowe are having an interesting conversation on the Role of the OS from the desktop perspective. I&#039;m knee-deep working with virtual appliances these days, which tend to be server-based at this point. There we</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Role of the OS on the desktop?</strong></p>
<p>Kimbro at Virtualization Daily and Scott Lowe are having an interesting conversation on the Role of the OS from the desktop perspective. I&#8217;m knee-deep working with virtual appliances these days, which tend to be server-based at this point. There we</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

