Parallels Desktop for Mac took the prize as the first virtualization solution for Intel-based Macs (OK, the first commercial solution). Even so, heavyweight VMware’s entry into the Mac market caused many to say, “Well, there goes Parallels.â€
Not so fast. I’m a huge VMware fan and make no secret of it. But in perusing the list of features for this latest beta, I see a couple of features that VMware ought to be worried about:
- The ability to boot from a Boot Camp partition (this allows you to use a single installation of Windows XP that can be booted via Boot Camp or booted virtually)
- “Coherency modeâ€, in which Windows windows (sorry, not really sure how else to put it) side-by-side with Mac OS X windows. It reminds me of the rootless X11 display that ships with Mac OS X and allows X11 and Aqua applications to interact with each other.
In my eyes, coherency mode is huge. The ability to run Windows applications side-by-side with Mac OS X applications (and I suppose X11 applications) is phenomenal. Throw in (eventually) seamless window support from Citrix for their native Mac client and you’ve got yet another type of application window that can be resized, minimized, or moved just like any other. TSClientX has already added support for SeamlessRDP to make seamless windows available via RDP as well. Why not in our virtualization solutions, too?
Then you add solutions built on WINE, which are designed to emulate the Win32 API on a non-Windows operating system, and you’ve got lots of options for coexistence. The one thing in common about all these solutions? Simple: They’re all built on Mac OS X. Only the Mac operating system offers the ability to mix-and-match operating system windows on a single desktop at the same time. (To me, that is really cool.)
What’s really odd, too, is that there was talk at VMworld 2006 about customers wanting this functionality (“coherency mode†or native windows) added to VMware Fusion. I guess now VMware has another set of reasons to look into this feature: the need to keep pace with the competition.
Tags: Fusion, Macintosh, Virtualization, VMware


3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/12/04/macintosh-virtualization-heating-up/trackback/
Tuesday, December 5, 2006 at 8:42 am
Pingback from RoudyBob.NET » Parallels Desktop for Mac Beta - Feature Overload
Monday, December 4, 2006 at 9:51 am
Daniel M.
Small world, Scott!
As my company’s VCP + Mac tech, I was in the same Fusion meet you were at during VMworld. It was a small gathering but there was lots of useful info.
With OS X, Windows is the new “Classic” the same way MacOS 9 was for PowerPC Macs.
Interesting times ahead!
Cheers,
D.
Monday, December 4, 2006 at 10:38 am
slowe
Daniel,
Oh, yes–you and I spoke briefly about the SeamlessRDP support you’d added to TSClientX. Good to hear from you again! I’m most definitely looking forward to the increased competition for virtualization on Intel-based Macs, and excited about the development prowess that VMware can bring to bear on their VMware Fusion product. It’s incredible to me the way Mac OS X has become this “melting pot” of functionality in which users can run Windows applications (via virtualization or WINE-like solutions), X11 applications, UNIX command-line applications, and native Mac OS X Cocoa/Carbon applications all at the same time. (Did I miss any?) It’s truly remarkable.
Scott