WinFS Axed27 June 2006 · Filed in News
I hate to say this, but I’m not really surprised. Microsoft has been talking about this abstract storage strategy since the pre-NT4 days, when “Cairo” was going to introduce the Object File System. The idea keeps getting pushed farther, and farther, and farther back…
In the meantime, technologies and products such as Spotlight (for Mac OS X), Beagle (for Linux), and Google Desktop (for Windows) continue to improve and continue to make this kind of sweeping technological change irrelevant. Is that why Microsoft killed WinFS? Do they feel the need for WinFS has been eliminated due to pervasive search technologies being embedded in the OS? Perhaps, but I would disagree with that belief. Tacking search technologies onto a file system instead of fixing the file system is just covering up the problem.
Instead, why not focus on more fully utilizing the functionality of the file system you’ve got? Why is Windows still relying on file name extensions to determine file types when that information could be stored in an alternate data stream directly in NTFS? Why aren’t applications being written to be able to take advantage of things like alternate data streams, or extensible properties?Tags: Microsoft · Storage · Windows Previous Post: NetApp ONTAP Simulator and ESX Server Next Post: Available Exploit Code for RRAS Vulnerability